Skip to main content

BUSINESS WITH INTEGRITY

We often look to the private sector for things like efficiency, ethics and effectiveness as opposed to the government domain. 
We also introduce regulations as a means to monitor and provide guidelines for the operations of private businesses.

However it is disappointing to note that businesses have proven time and after again that the means of monitoring by regulation is a necessity.

Multinationals, companies who make profit in billions of dollars cannot provide service or sell their products without the manipulation of the purses of their customers.
Many businesses out of what I do not know what to name it force their consumers to patronize their products even when the customer clearly does not need it thereby extorting money the customer did not willingly pay in the first place, just to make profit.
Companies involved in these kind of practices include Telecommnications and the Banking sectors. A notorious company whose name I won't mention forces caller tunes on customers claiming the customers subscribed for the tunes. And there are banks who debit customers accounts in shady dealings. Others help politicians involved in Money Laundering.

Businesses and Business leaders have to remember that one of the cardinal rules of ethics in business is Integrity. Many of them are already making enough money without extorting more from customers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE SILENCE OF OMISSION

Silence means consent, a certain school of thought holds. That means if you fail to speak up against anything wrong, you can be charged with supporting the wrong you failed to speak up about.

The End SARS Protests

I have been quiet since the end sars movement started. Not because I didn’t want to speak but because I was hoping for it to culminate into something tangible and bring about the positive change that a lot of Nigerians desired. I remember having a conversation about it with someone and I prayed that it would not spiral out of control. I wanted a positive change but I wasn’t prepared for the cost of laying down lives because I sensed that it was going to get to that should the protesters expand their agitation to good governance. The powers that be would not surrender without a fight and they have the resources of the government on their side. They would claim that the protesters wanted to topple a “democratically elected” president. And that would make it illegal. And what is democratic about a president who has refused to listen to the cries of the people?In their short memory however, they have forgotten that this same president came into power for the first time in 1985 after a coup...