Skip to main content

SEXUAL FANTASIES

Almost anybody can relate with this; especially those marrying for sex. To them sex is marriage and marriage is sex and the prospect of marrying a great sexual partner beats the idea that apart from sex there are other qualities you look out for in a partner. So they proceed to make a life-long commitment on the basis of sex. And when life disappoints them they soon find out that sex was never enough.


Our parents learnt on each other and they are still learning. For the youths of today it is no more fashionable to wait until after marriage. They prefer sampling and tasting or doing their own learning before the d-day.

The acrobatics you want to be performed on you in bed can blind your eyes to the fact that marriage also involves a spiritual partner and most times a co-parent.
And decency permits you to see sex as a sacred union and your partner as your partner in that sacredness.

Now most couples watch pornography before sex and they bear children. What sort of children do you think they are bringing forth?
Your guess is as good as mine; children who are as ugly as the act that produced them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SILENCE OF OMISSION

Silence means consent, a certain school of thought holds. That means if you fail to speak up against anything wrong, you can be charged with supporting the wrong you failed to speak up about.
Post a Comment
Read more

The End SARS Protests

I have been quiet since the end sars movement started. Not because I didn’t want to speak but because I was hoping for it to culminate into something tangible and bring about the positive change that a lot of Nigerians desired. I remember having a conversation about it with someone and I prayed that it would not spiral out of control. I wanted a positive change but I wasn’t prepared for the cost of laying down lives because I sensed that it was going to get to that should the protesters expand their agitation to good governance. The powers that be would not surrender without a fight and they have the resources of the government on their side. They would claim that the protesters wanted to topple a “democratically elected” president. And that would make it illegal. And what is democratic about a president who has refused to listen to the cries of the people?In their short memory however, they have forgotten that this same president came into power for the first time in 1985 after a coup...
Post a Comment
Read more