Skip to main content

THE DEFINITION OF WEALTH

We all admire wealthy people. Society respects wealth. And preferential treatment are given to children of the wealthy but what is wealth?
Wealth can be defined as the value of all the property, possessions or money that someone has.

Sadly many of the wealthy people in Nigeria are chronic debtors
owing from bank to bank. Their assets are borrowed assets, can they then still be classified as wealthy people? Their life is a lie and all the things they claim to have are borrowed so who is fooling who?

The businesses they have have since gone under and bank loans are keeping them afloat. They borrow from banks and use half of the loan for their business and the rest to finance their extravagant lifestyle.

In reality, they are bankrupt and should have long filed for bankruptcy. They are poor role models for they teach young people that the way to wealth is borrowing. They are in fact poor business people since they have no solid investments and cannot manage their profits and resources.

 Their business model should be taught in business schools as a no no for running a business to avoid bankruptcy.

Finally, they should not be referred to as wealthy people anymore since in actual fact they are broke as their liabilities and debts outweigh their assets.
Ukwuoma Obele.
PHOTO CREDIT:INTERNET

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE SILENCE OF OMISSION

Silence means consent, a certain school of thought holds. That means if you fail to speak up against anything wrong, you can be charged with supporting the wrong you failed to speak up about.

The End SARS Protests

I have been quiet since the end sars movement started. Not because I didn’t want to speak but because I was hoping for it to culminate into something tangible and bring about the positive change that a lot of Nigerians desired. I remember having a conversation about it with someone and I prayed that it would not spiral out of control. I wanted a positive change but I wasn’t prepared for the cost of laying down lives because I sensed that it was going to get to that should the protesters expand their agitation to good governance. The powers that be would not surrender without a fight and they have the resources of the government on their side. They would claim that the protesters wanted to topple a “democratically elected” president. And that would make it illegal. And what is democratic about a president who has refused to listen to the cries of the people?In their short memory however, they have forgotten that this same president came into power for the first time in 1985 after a coup...