Skip to main content

THE ALTERNATIVE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY AND THE IMPLICATION FOR TERRORISTS

The recent meeting in Washington D.C of world leaders to discuss the alternative of nuclear energy for power generation poses a lot of questions:

Obama has sounded a note of warning but is a note of warning enough?

Consider the points below:

NIGERIA COULDN'T CONTROL BOKO HARAM

IMAGINE IF THEY HAD ACCESS TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS

IMAGINE  THE DAMAGE THEY COULD DO

CALCULATE THE SCOPE OF DAMAGE

ONCE THE TECHNOLOGY IS AVAILABLE IT COULD EASILY BE DEVELOPED BY TERRORISTS ON THEIR OWN

More thought should be given to this matter before the approval  of nuclear energy by world powers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SILENCE OF OMISSION

Silence means consent, a certain school of thought holds. That means if you fail to speak up against anything wrong, you can be charged with supporting the wrong you failed to speak up about.
Post a Comment
Read more

The End SARS Protests

I have been quiet since the end sars movement started. Not because I didn’t want to speak but because I was hoping for it to culminate into something tangible and bring about the positive change that a lot of Nigerians desired. I remember having a conversation about it with someone and I prayed that it would not spiral out of control. I wanted a positive change but I wasn’t prepared for the cost of laying down lives because I sensed that it was going to get to that should the protesters expand their agitation to good governance. The powers that be would not surrender without a fight and they have the resources of the government on their side. They would claim that the protesters wanted to topple a “democratically elected” president. And that would make it illegal. And what is democratic about a president who has refused to listen to the cries of the people?In their short memory however, they have forgotten that this same president came into power for the first time in 1985 after a coup...
Post a Comment
Read more